Skip to main content
Move the World.
Does CRISPR Cause Cancer?

The breakthrough gene editing technique CRISPR has a problem: it might only work by increasing the risk of cancer. Two studies published this week in Nature Medicine found that cells edited with CRISPR-Cas9 were more likely to develop mutations and become cancerous. That means therapies that involve replacing disease-causing genes with healthy versions and returning the modified cells to patients could ultimately seed tumors throughout their bodies.

Biotech investors are spooked, but most geneticists are taking the studies in stride. They believe that the problem is manageable, and some are doubtful that these lab results will translate to the real world.

Hurray, Efficiency! But Wait, Maybe Also Cancer?

The biggest problem with gene editing is that it's extremely inefficient: most of the cells that get CRISPR'd refuse the genetic changes. This makes it slow and expensive, and you have to do a lot of testing to find the cells that took the edits. Scientists managed to boost CRISPR's efficiency up to 80%, but, disturbingly, the edited cells were now much more likely become cancerous.

DNA Hates to Change

Your body really doesn't like it when something breaks your DNA—especially since the cause is usually a virus, chemicals, or radiation—so there's a genetic "kill switch," called p53, to stop cells with broken DNA from replicating. When CRISPR cuts both strands of DNA to insert a new gene, that triggers a chemical that activates the failsafe: the cell will either repair the cut (erasing CRISPR's insertion) or die. Either way, the new gene won't take.

Naturally Selecting for… Cancer

Scientists found a way to brute force the problem and get the share of cells who accepted the changes at the end to 4 out of 5. But Darwin warned us about natural selection 150 years ago. By forcing CRISPR-Cas9 into the DNA, you're weeding out the cells with a working failsafe. Those cells will self-destruct if they can't repair the edited DNA, and then you're left with a pool of cells that don't die when their DNA breaks.

And that leads to cancer. In fact, according to STAT News, malfunctioning p53 genes are responsible for a huge share of cancers: "nearly half of ovarian cancers; 43 percent of colorectal cancers; 38 percent of lung cancers; nearly one-third of pancreatic, stomach, and liver cancers; and one-quarter of breast cancers."

This is something that bears paying
attention to, but I don’t think it’s
a deal-breaker.

Erik Sontheimer, Intellia Therapeutics

Who Want Some Caveats?

The bad news: our miracle gene therapy might cause disease, in addition to fixing it. The good news: there's lots of caveats that leave scientists room for hope and directions for improvement.

First, the cancer effect has never actually been seen in lab mice who have been treated with CRISPR-Cas9 (at least not yet). That doesn't mean it doesn't happen or that those CRISPR'd cells didn't increase the risk of cancer, but the effect might be rare in a real-world environment, rather than a petri dish. It could be that CRISPR's natural inefficiency has reduced the likelihood of cancer, or it could be that the body's other defense systems pick off the new cancer-prone cells.

Second, the problem only affects one kind of edit: swapping in a whole new gene for an old one. But the studies found that CRISPR can still delete disease-causing genes, like the one that causes sickle cell, without triggering the kill switch.

There are several other techniques that won't have this problem, either: CRISPR that uses enzymes other Cas9, editing T cells to fight cancer, and CRISPR 2.0 (which edits DNA letter by letter, rather than cutting the strand and swapping in a big chunk).

What It Means

The scientists behind the two studies think the best solution is just to be cautious with CRISPR-Cas9. The critical thing is just to make sure that cells do have a working copy of the p53 gene after getting CRISPR'd, and that can be checked pretty easily these days.

It might take more work than we expected, but you can always just culture the cells that both accepted the CRISPR edits and have a working failsafe until you have enough cells to do the treatment right. The takeaway is that, like everything in science, there are  risks and tradeoffs that have to be investigated.

Up Next

Future of Medicine
The First Universal Flu Vaccine Could Be Coming Soon
The First Universal Flu Vaccine Could Be Coming Soon
Future of Medicine
The First Universal Flu Vaccine Could Be Coming Soon
After flu season, vaccines are outdated and researchers must predict next year’s virus. But soon, we may have a universal flu vaccine that doesn't expire.

After flu season, vaccines are outdated and researchers must predict next year’s virus. But soon, we may have a universal flu vaccine that doesn't expire.

Women Leaders
Female Scientists Were Written out of History Books. Margaret Rossiter Changed That.
Female Scientists Were Written out of History Books. Margaret Rossiter Changed That.
Women Leaders
Female Scientists Were Written out of History Books. Margaret Rossiter Changed That.
Margaret Rossiter has made it her lifework to spotlight female scientists who were written out of history books through systematic censorship. Read our Q&A with this groundbreaking historian.

Margaret Rossiter has made it her lifework to spotlight female scientists who were written out of history books through systematic censorship. Read our Q&A with this groundbreaking historian.

Seachange
Coral Reefs Are Dying, but Here’s Why There’s Still Hope
How to Save the Coral Reefs
Watch Now
Seachange
Coral Reefs Are Dying, but Here’s Why There’s Still Hope
Coral reefs are the foundation of ocean life, and yet 50% of them have been lost. Here’s why coral reefs are dying and what one group is doing to stop it.
Watch Now

In the face of a changing climate, coral reefs are dying all over the world. Coral reefs make up the foundation of ocean life, and yet 50% of them have been lost in the last three decades. Are coral reefs in danger of disappearing forever? A group of innovative researchers and divers is racing against the clock to save them.

Reverse Innovation
MacGyver Medicine Can Save Lives
MacGyver Medicine Can Save Lives
Reverse Innovation
MacGyver Medicine Can Save Lives
The package is simple and dirt-cheap—a plastic bag with a condom, a syringe, a rubber tube, and a card with...

The package is simple and dirt-cheap—a plastic bag with a condom, a syringe, a rubber tube, and a card with instructions—but it can mean the difference between a mother living and dying.

Dispatches
How Redesigning Labs Can Demystify Genetic Science
How Redesigning Labs Can Demystify Genetic Science
Dispatches
How Redesigning Labs Can Demystify Genetic Science
"Scientists work in high-security buildings that are banned to the public and then wonder why they are misunderstood."
By Brook Muller

"Scientists work in high-security buildings that are banned to the public and then wonder why they are misunderstood."

Dispatches
Neuroscientists Want to Beam Experiences Directly into Your Brain
Neuroscientists Want to Beam Experiences Directly into Your Brain
Dispatches
Neuroscientists Want to Beam Experiences Directly into Your Brain
It's a breakthrough for the blind and paralyzed, not the first step toward the Matrix. (Promise.)

It's a breakthrough for the blind and paralyzed, not the first step toward the Matrix. (Promise.)

The New Space Race
The Startup That May Be On the Cusp of Revolutionizing the Satellite Industry
The Startup That May Be On the Cusp of Revolutionizing the Satellite Industry
The New Space Race
The Startup That May Be On the Cusp of Revolutionizing the Satellite Industry
Spire's satellites fit in the palm of your hand, cost a fraction of their predecessors, and transmit more data than...
By Mike Riggs

Spire's satellites fit in the palm of your hand, cost a fraction of their predecessors, and transmit more data than several behemoth satellites combined.

The New Space Race
What Happens When Stuff Breaks in Space?
What Happens When Stuff Breaks in Space?
The New Space Race
What Happens When Stuff Breaks in Space?
Despite rigorous prep, astronauts often have to improvise when things go wrong in space. And a lot more duct tape...
By Mike Riggs

Despite rigorous prep, astronauts often have to improvise when things go wrong in space. And a lot more duct tape is involved than you may expect.

Superhuman
Open Sourcing the Brain
Open Sourcing the Brain
Watch Now
Superhuman
Open Sourcing the Brain
Open BCI has developed a 3D-printed headset that allows your brain to interact with computers in amazing ways.
Watch Now

OpenBCI has developed a 3D-printed headset that allows our brains to interact with software. Want to measure the effect of meditation on your brain? It's possible. Want to control a prosthetic limb with your mind? It's possible. Right now, the only thing OpenBCI's tech can't do are the things we haven't thought of.