Uber may reduce drunk driving deaths by 6%

A new analysis suggests the company is saving nearly 500 lives every year.
Sign up for the Freethink Weekly newsletter!
A collection of our favorite stories straight to your inbox

Uber is saving lives, reducing drunk driving deaths by more than 6%, according to a new analysis by researchers from UC Berkeley.

The challenge: Ridesharing proponents have long claimed the services could make streets safer — instead of getting behind the wheel of a car, people impaired by drugs, alcohol, or sleep deprivation would just hail an Uber or Lyft from their smartphones.

Proving those claims hasn’t been easy, though.

Relying only on publicly available data on traffic fatalities and the dates that ridesharing services began operating in a city, various studies have found that ridesharing has decreased drunk driving deaths, increased them, or had no effect at all.

The new analysis: In a new working paper at the National Bureau of Economic Research, the UC Berkeley researchers went straight to the source for their data: Uber.

Total traffic fatalities dropped by 4%.

Instead of just looking at ridesharing activity at the city level, they drilled down much deeper, zooming in to the level of census tracts (an area with roughly 4,000 people).

The results: After comparing the data on Ubers to fatality statistics from the federal government, the researchers determined that Uber reduced drunk driving deaths by 6.1% and total traffic fatalities by 4% in 2019.

That equates to nearly 500 lives saved over the course of the year.

“Note that these calculations include lives saved by Uber only,” the researchers write. “Total lives saved by ridesharing would also include the impacts of competitors such as Lyft.”

The cold water: As this is just a working paper, its findings are preliminary and have not been verified through peer-review.

Additionally, the researchers note in the paper that Uber staff got to decide what data to release for the analysis (although not what the UC Berkeley team published), raising the question of bias.

Still, if nothing else, the new paper suggests that census tract data could be the key to determining conclusively what impact rideshare services are having on traffic fatalities.

We’d love to hear from you! If you have a comment about this article or if you have a tip for a future Freethink story, please email us at [email protected].

Related
My anxious generation: The unforeseen toll of a digital childhood
In this op-ed, columnist Rikki Schlott draws from personal experience to argue that a digital childhood is a childhood squandered.
Potato chips or heroin? The debate on social media and mental health
Experts disagree on whether social media causes mental health issues in adolescents despite looking at the same data. Here’s why.
How the TikTok case pits national security against freedom of speech
Whether the video-sharing app TikTok is banned or not, it will continue to add fuel to the fiery debate on freedom of speech.
Tesla’s new self-driving software throws out its old code entirely
Tesla made a bold move ahead of its robotaxi launch, completely overhauling the code for its Full Self-Driving (FSD) software.
Flying cars are almost here — but who will actually fly them?
Air taxi services could launch soon, but only if regulators and developers can make operating eVTOLs appealing to prospective pilots.
Up Next
autonomous shuttle
Subscribe to Freethink for more great stories