New air filter for COVID-19 could lower risk of being indoors

It heats up to nearly 400 degrees Fahrenheit to kill the coronavirus.

Face masks and social distancing can help block coronavirus-carrying respiratory droplets. But if the virus is airborne — meaning it can travel in smaller aerosol particles, as many scientists believe it can — stemming its spread indoors will require better air filtration systems.

Now, researchers in Texas have created an air filter for COVID-19 that kills 99.8% of coronavirus particles that pass through it — a development that could help make indoor living and working less risky as society emerges from lockdowns.

The Coronavirus-Killing Air Filter

Thanks to existing research, the team behind the new air filter for COVID-19 knew when starting their project that the coronavirus dies if exposed to temperatures above 158 degrees Fahrenheit.

Armed with that knowledge, they set out to create an air filter capable of catching and then heating coronavirus to a temperature far higher: 392 degrees Fahrenheit.

Its ability to help control the spread of the virus could be very useful for society.

Zhifeng Ren

Repurposing a standard air filter to kill the coronavirus in this way wasn’t an option — their pores are too large to catch the virus, and they’re too difficult to heat to the needed temperature.

Instead, the researchers decided to fashion their air filter for COVID-19 out of commercial nickel foam, which has pores that are ideally spaced and sized for filtering out aerosols containing the coronavirus.

The foam is also electrically conductive, meaning it could be self-heating; that allowed the researchers to avoid using an external heat source, which would’ve likely caused a large temperature increase in the surrounding air. (Not ideal in the summer, of course, particularly in Texas.)

According to the group’s paper, published in the journal Materials Today Physics, just one pass through a prototype of their air filter for COVID-19 was enough to kill 99.8% of coronavirus particles in aerosols during testing at the Galveston National Laboratory.

Multi-Prong Effort to Kill the Coronavirus

It must be noted that there’s a big difference between killing nearly 100% of coronavirus particles and killing all of the particles.

Like so many things about the novel coronavirus, its infectious dose — the number of virus-carrying particles that would need to enter your body before you’d actually develop an infection — is still a mystery.

Inhaling a single viral particle wouldn’t be enough to make you sick — your immune system would quickly kill it — but what if you inhaled 50? Or 500?

We simply don’t know, which means installing an air filter for COVID-19 that lets through 0.2% of coronavirus-carrying aerosols won’t be enough to eliminate the possibility of people in the building catching COVID-19.

If 0.2% of viruses get through per hour, how much virus will be in the air after an 8-hour shift? Enough to cause new infections? The answer would depend on how many people inside are exhaling virus particles, and for how long, and how quickly the particles degrade on their own. We simply don’t have enough information to answer those questions yet.

Still, it could lower the risk, especially if combined with face masks, social distancing, and other mitigation strategies.

“This filter could be useful in airports and in airplanes, in office buildings, schools, and cruise ships to stop the spread of COVID-19,” University of Houston researcher Zhifeng Ren, a co-developer of the filter, said in a press release.

“Its ability to help control the spread of the virus could be very useful for society,” he added.

We’d love to hear from you! If you have a comment about this article or if you have a tip for a future Freethink story, please email us at [email protected].

How do researchers study the prevalence of mental illnesses?
Data on mental health is essential to understand the scale of mental illnesses. How do researchers collect this data, and is it reliable?
How AI played an instrumental role in making mRNA vaccines
Years before Moderna created an effective mRNA vaccine against COVID, the company put into place AI systems to accelerate the research process.
What BMI can’t tell us about our health
Body mass index (BMI) continues to be the go-to tool for medical doctors and population researchers despite saying little about our health.
Why aren’t we moving faster on malaria vaccines?
COVID-19 shots were rolled out within weeks of approval. The malaria jab is being delayed until mid-2024. Why?
Where are the universal coronavirus vaccines?
Universal coronavirus vaccines that protect against all known variants of COVID-19 — and ones that don’t exist yet — are closer than ever.
Up Next
Is the Coronavirus Airborne
Subscribe to Freethink for more great stories