New blood test for Alzheimer’s is as accurate as brain scans

The only diagnostic method that’s more accurate: brain autopsies.

Long before a person starts exhibiting the cognitive problems associated with Alzheimer’s disease, their brain will develop abnormalities that doctors can detect through brain scans and spinal taps.

However, because those methods are costly, invasive, and time-consuming, most people never know they have Alzheimer’s until they start experiencing symptoms.

Now, researchers have developed a blood test for Alzheimer’s that can accurately diagnose patients with the disease — even if they aren’t expected to develop symptoms for decades.

Experts believe this Alzheimer’s test could be ready for clinical use within three years — meaning doctors could soon have a cheaper, simpler way to diagnose the disease early in its development.

Why Test for Alzheimer’s?

Before getting into how the test for Alzheimer’s works, it’s worth considering the need for one.

After all, there’s no way to treat the disease — only its symptoms — so what’s the point of a test that diagnoses it years before it’ll have any impact on a person’s life? Wouldn’t knowing what’s ahead only cause people unnecessary stress?

That may be, but Alzheimer’s researchers are constantly working to find new treatments, and in general, the earlier doctors begin treating a disease, the better the patient outcomes. It’s possible that being able to intervene sooner will give doctors a leg up in developing therapies that might not be effective later on.

That means that once treatments are available, countless people could benefit from a test for Alzheimer’s that can detect the disease in its beginning stages.

In the meantime, an early diagnosis can give people with the disease time to prepare for it, as well as give them the option to participate in the clinical trials needed to find those Alzheimer’s treatments.

A Better Alzheimer’s Test

The abnormalities in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients — amyloid plaques (clumps of sticky amyloid proteins) and tau tangles (twisted strands of tau proteins) — begin forming two decades or more before people begin experiencing symptoms.

Until now, without a brain scan or spinal tap, there was no way to know this was happening.

Until now, without a brain scan or spinal tap, there was no way to know this was happening.

A Lund University-led research team discovered that it could predict the presence of both plaques and tangles in a person’s brain by measuring the amount of one specific tau protein (p-tau217) in their blood.

For a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the researchers evaluated the accuracy of their blood test for Alzheimer’s on 1,402 people.

They found that it was more accurate than MRI scans at detecting the disease and as accurate as PET scans and spinal taps. The only method more accurate is the only one that can definitively diagnose Alzheimer’s: a brain autopsy.

The Potential of P-tau217

The same day the Lund University team published its study, researchers from Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis (WUSTL) published a separate paper that also supports the use of p-tau217 as a target for a blood test for Alzheimer’s.

In that study, published in the Journal of Experimental Medicine, the researchers used a different method to measure the p-tau217 levels in participants’ blood, but also found a correlation between higher levels of the protein and the presence of amyloid plaques.

Accurate, low-cost diagnosis is really exciting, so it’s a breakthrough.

Michael Weiner

“I personally find it very reassuring that these different groups are using different types of assays and getting the same result,” WUSTL researcher Suzanne Schindler told the New York Times.

“It looks real,” she continued. “It looks like 217 has tremendous promise as a blood test for Alzheimer’s disease, and it is likely to correspond with the symptoms.”

While neither team’s Alzheimer’s test is ready for clinical use just yet, Michael Weiner, an Alzheimer’s disease researcher at UC San Francisco who was not involved in either study, told the NYT he thinks they could be “within a few years.”

“It’s not a cure, it’s not a treatment, but you can’t treat the disease without being able to diagnose it, and accurate, low-cost diagnosis is really exciting, so it’s a breakthrough,” he said.

We’d love to hear from you! If you have a comment about this article or if you have a tip for a future Freethink story, please email us at [email protected].

Revolutionary weight-loss drugs like Wegovy come with a catch
People taking GLP-1 agonists are losing too much muscle, but these drugs designed to prevent muscle loss could solve the problem.
What hybrid mouse/rat brains are showing us about the mind
Modified mice with hybrid brains that include rat neurons could one day lead to new breakthroughs in neuroscience.
How sensory gamma rhythm stimulation clears amyloid in Alzheimer’s mice
Study finds stimulating a brain rhythm with light and sound increases peptide release from interneurons, possibly slowing Alzheimer’s progression.
Brain implant for “artificial vision” is still working after 2 years
A new type of brain implant technology has given a man with total blindness a kind of “artificial vision.”
AI can help predict whether a patient will respond to specific tuberculosis treatments
Instead of a one-size-fits-all treatment approach, AI could help personalize treatments for each patient to provide the best outcomes.
Up Next
Heart Pump
Subscribe to Freethink for more great stories