The forgotten war on the Walkman

Before it was a cultural icon, the Sony Walkman sparked moral panic, strange laws, and acts of civil disobedience.
Sign up for Pessimists Archive Substack
Pessimists Archive is a project to jog our collective memories about the hysteria, technophobia, and moral panic that often greets new technologies, ideas, and trends.

First released in 1979, the Sony Walkman is now an icon of the 1980s, eliciting nostalgia for the “good old days” of owning music rather than renting it. Affection for the device is now universal, but that wasn’t always the case…

A collage of newspaper headlines expresses concern about Walkmans, calling them a menace, and discusses bans, public furor, and fears of social isolation caused by personal stereos.

The sudden rise of headphone-wearing pedestrians — spurred by Sony’s lightweight headsets, which were 17% the weight of others’ devices — caused unease about an unfamiliar new world quickly coming into view.

Vintage newspaper clippings discuss the social impact of Walkman headphones, featuring headlines and black-and-white photos of people wearing headphones in public settings.

Some said it was a sign of a continued rise of Reagan- and Thatcher-style individualism. Cultural critic Allan Bloom deemed the Walkman “a nonstop…masturbational fantasy” in his 1987 book “The Closing of the American Mind.” Neo-Luddite John Zerzan saw the Walkman as part of a modern trend that encouraged a “protective sort of withdrawal from social connections.” Thomas Lipscomb, chief of the Center for the Digital Future, equated it with the euphoric drug “soma,” from Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World,” creating, as he put it, “an airtight bubble of sound” that was nothing but a “sensory depressant.” 

In other words, it all felt “a bit Black Mirror,” as one might say today. (Credit to this 1999 Reason Magazine article for this collection of quotes)


The Walkman, critics claimed, was more than just music to one’s ears. It was a tool of societal disconnect and, for government officials and law enforcement, a danger on the roads because it limited the hearing of drivers, cyclists, and pedestrians.

A newspaper headline reads “Walkmen may cause deafness, accidents and neuroses," with columns of text discussing potential health risks of using Walkman devices.

After a number of accidents involving Walkman headphones, numerous states across the US swiftly put into effect (or proposed) restrictions, many related to headphone use while driving or cycling. Among them were statutes in California, Florida, Georgia, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Washington.

A collage of newspaper clippings from the 1980s about proposed and enacted restrictions on Walkman radios and headphone use, featuring headlines, a U.S. map, and health concerns.

The New Jersey township of Woodbridge went a step further, forbidding not just driving or biking, but even crossing the street while wearing Walkman headphones.

Newspaper clipping with headline "Ordinance Prohibits Stereo Headphones" describing a law in Woodbridge, NJ banning portable headphone use by motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists on roadways.

The price for breaking this prohibition? A potential two-week stay in jail and a fine. The law made national and international news, including the BBC who got reactions on the street.

The day the law was put into effect, Oscar Gross, a retiree from a neighboring town, was spurred into action. Seething, he approached Police Sergeant Lou Monzo, purposefully donned his headphones, and crossed the street.

Two black-and-white newspaper clippings show a man being cited by a police officer for wearing headphones in public, with headlines discussing opposition to the Walkman law.

The outcome of this small act of civil disobedience? Gross became the first person to receive a citation for wearing headphones (even though they weren’t plugged into anything). Undeterred, he stated in an interview, “I’m prepared to go to jail for 15 days just to prove a point.”

Two black-and-white newspaper photos show a man interacting with police officers; one image shows a discussion, the other shows an officer walking with the man in handcuffs.

Gross ended up being interviewed for national outlets, as did members of the Woodbridge town council. However, to his disappointment, Gross was not sent to jail. After the judge imposed a $50 fine, which was later suspended, a frustrated Gross said to a journalist, “He didn’t even give me the opportunity to say that I was willing to serve time in jail.”

“No municipality has the right to tell somebody what they can wear.”

Oscar Gross

Oscar Gross was preparing to take the case all the way to the Supreme Court, but backed out after someone was killed crossing the street while wearing headphones — the kind of tragic anecdote that is the inevitable and unavoidable price of freedom.

This chapter in techno-pessimism is a good reminder that nostalgia tends to elicit amnesia about the resistance new technologies once faced. After all, who would have thought the “good old days” could ever have been considered a bad, brave new world?

This article was originally published on Pessimists Archive. It is reprinted with permission of the author.

We’d love to hear from you! If you have a comment about this article or if you have a tip for a future Freethink story, please email us at [email protected].

Sign up for Pessimists Archive Substack
Pessimists Archive is a project to jog our collective memories about the hysteria, technophobia, and moral panic that often greets new technologies, ideas, and trends.
Related
Governing AGI: Model laws, chip wars, and sovereign AI
The US must regulate AI in a way that protects society, preserves America’s competitive edge, and fosters innovation — all at the same time.
The age of industrialized imagination
By slashing costs, AI will spark a creative renaissance in the entertainment industry, leading to more working artists, not fewer.
America’s next grand mission: Build an AI-powered society for all
America’s new mission isn’t just to invent the new technology of AI. It must invent the systems that then make the most of AI.
The real danger in “I, Robot” isn’t AI. It’s humans.
“I, Robot” is a convincing allegory in favor of embracing AI innovation rather than over-regulating, centralizing, and stifling it.
The Golden Dome should be built — just not the way Trump imagines
President Trump’s headline-grabbing Golden Dome proposal can serve as the spark for a more realistic homeland defense upgrade.
Up Next
A person wearing a mechanical exoskeleton device on their hand, with metal components attached to each finger.
Subscribe to Freethink for more great stories