Skip to main content
Move the World.
Meet the Artist Who Paints With DNA Clues

When Maayan Harel paints a portrait, her subject isn't sitting in front of her. She doesn't even have a photograph to work from. Instead, she looks at clues from ancient human DNA.

Last month, scientists from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem made headlines when they revealed Harel's portrait of a Denisovan, an extinct group of archaic humans that may have lived with Neanderthals.

The first Denisovan remains were discovered a decade ago in a Siberian cave. Since then, researchers have collected small fossils – teeth, a jawbone, a finger – but not enough to reconstruct an entire face or body.

So, they looked for clues in the Denisovan DNA. They homed in on epigenetic changes, heritable changes that influence gene activity and how a gene is expressed as a characteristic or trait. The expression of these traits are clues about what one possible Denisovan might look like. Science illustrator, Harel interpreted those clues to create a science-based portrait of the ancient human.

Freethink talked with Harel about the balance of artistic freedom and scientific accuracy.

This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Maayan Harel sculpting the model used for her portrait of a Denisovan human. Photo courtesy of Maayan Harel.

Maayan Harel sculpting the model used for her portrait of a Denisovan human. Photo courtesy of Maayan Harel.

Freethink: How is science illustration different from other portrait art?

Harel: An artist's work is their own interpretation. But this portrait was entirely based on research, plus the artist's interpretation when necessary. I didn't think, "Oh, I want her to look like this." Instead, I thought, "This is what we know, this is how to present what we know. This is the best possible representation."

Even though this is not a picture of an actual Denisovan and this is what she (in particular) looked like, it's the genetic analysis of one specific specimen, so it is based on one Denisovan. But the traits that they found are not individual traits. The results are more generalistic.

Freethink: What was the biggest challenge in creating a portrait based on DNA?

Harel: The biggest challenge was conceiving the whole way to do it. It's a very unusual situation. In most reconstructions, you have a skull to work with. I've never encountered anything like this, and I think it's pretty unusual – figuring out how to work from, basically, an Excel spreadsheet and bring something to life was really challenging.

It's hard to put 3D (on) to 2D, because you have only a certain list of things that are known from the research, so a more appropriate solution was to sculpt. So I sculpted the skull, and then I put it in a dark closet so that I could simulate a cave, and photographed it. Then I painted it digitally in Photoshop.

Science illustrator Maayan Harel's portrait of a Denisovan, an extinct group of ancient humans that may have lived with Neanderthals. Harel interpreted DNA clues to create a science-based portrait. Image courtesy of Maayan Harel.

Science illustrator Maayan Harel's portrait of a Denisovan, an extinct group of ancient humans that may have lived with Neanderthals. Harel interpreted DNA clues to create a science-based portrait. Image courtesy of Maayan Harel.

Freethink: What kind of clues did the researchers provide?

Harel: I got a list of traits. One of the most unique traits is they had very wide parietal bones – the top of their skulls were quite wide. The other is that they had a very large dental arch and large teeth. I had a list of about 50 traits, and the skull was probably two-thirds of that. We knew those few traits about the skull, but we didn't know anything else.

Once we had the sculpture of the skull, it was something that could be worked from. So if I know that the parietal bones are wider, I can expand them by hand. If I know the nose projection is somewhere between this and that, I can kind of adjust it.

Freethink: How accurate is the portrait?

Harel: It's not accurate in the sense that it's one particular girl. This portrait is meant to give a final possible face. Given that Denisovans are genetically very similar to Neanderthals, and there's a lot of evidence that they lived alongside Neanderthals, we decided that anything that was unknown would be assumed (that) the trait is like the Neanderthal.

Part of the problem is, it sounds like you can now tell what a person looks like from their DNA. That's not the case at all. Like modern humans, everyone is an individual. So a lot of effort was actually put into making a Neanderthal profile that would be as generalistic and quintessential and as "this is a Neanderthal" as possible. So, we could say: if we're creating a general Denisovan and we're assuming that what we don't know is generally like Neanderthal, we have a good basis to work from.

Subscribe

Up Next

Coded
Meet the Artist and Activist Who Wants You to Erase Your DNA
Meet the Artist and Activist Who Wants You to Erase Your DNA
Coded
Meet the Artist and Activist Who Wants You to Erase Your DNA
Heather Dewey-Hagborg wants to make sure people understand the hidden secrets in the DNA they leave behind...
By Michael O'Shea

Heather Dewey-Hagborg wants to make sure people understand the hidden secrets in the DNA they leave behind everywhere they go.

A New Reality
How to Spot a Deepfake
How to Spot a Deepfake
Watch Now
A New Reality
How to Spot a Deepfake
Is artificial intelligence the key to knowing what’s real?
Watch Now

Deepfake videos use video manipulation to show people saying and doing things they never have. These engineers are using blockchain technology to separate fact from fiction. Deepfakes, fake videos generated using artificial intelligence technology, could be the next frontier in misinformation. While news video has historically been the gold standard of veracity, an era where video can be easily created could further erode...

Dispatches
Living Drugs May Be the Key to Beating Genetic Disease
Living Drugs May Be the Key to Beating Genetic Disease
Dispatches
Living Drugs May Be the Key to Beating Genetic Disease
Engineering bacteria in the microbiome could fix previously untreatable genetic disorders.
By Pedro Belda Ferre

Engineering bacteria in the microbiome could fix previously untreatable genetic disorders.

Dispatches
Personal Genetics Might Solve the Opioid Crisis – and the Pain Crisis
Personal Genetics Might Solve the Opioid Crisis – and the Pain Crisis
Dispatches
Personal Genetics Might Solve the Opioid Crisis – and the Pain Crisis
Why does pain hurt more for some people? Why do others feel nothing at all?
By Erin Young

Why does pain hurt more for some people? Why do others feel nothing at all?

Dispatches
Goodbye, Passwords: Hello Brain-ID
Goodbye, Passwords: Hello Brain-ID
Dispatches
Goodbye, Passwords: Hello Brain-ID
Can mind-readers replace passwords and biometric security?
By Wenyao Xu, Feng Lin and Zhanpeng Jin

Can mind-readers replace passwords and biometric security?

Dispatches
Study Shows Schizophrenia Begins in the Womb, Unraveling a Genetic Mystery
Study Shows Schizophrenia Begins in the Womb, Unraveling a Genetic Mystery
Dispatches
Study Shows Schizophrenia Begins in the Womb, Unraveling a Genetic Mystery
Half of genes linked to schizophrenia are primarily involved in the placenta, not the brain.

Half of genes linked to schizophrenia are primarily involved in the placenta, not the brain.

The New Space Race
Can We Make It In Space?
Can We Make It In Space?
Watch Now
The New Space Race
Can We Make It In Space?
What if one day, everything in space was made in space? 3D printing may hold the answer.
Watch Now

NASA intern turned Silicon Valley entrepreneur, Jason Dunn, saw what was holding humans back from colonizing outer space...and decided to do something about it. With his company Made in Space’s cutting-edge 3D printer, astronauts can break their reliance on costly resupply missions from Earth and—for the first time ever—build new supplies for themselves in space. Dunn and his team believe their invention will usher in a new...

This Computer Can Write 2,000 Snarky Articles Per Second
This Computer Can Write 2,000 Snarky Articles Per Second
This Computer Can Write 2,000 Snarky Articles Per Second
What does it mean for the future of journalism when a computer can turn mounds of data into a cohesive narrative?
By Mike Riggs

What does it mean for the future of journalism when a computer can turn mounds of data into a cohesive narrative?