Underwater robots may be the future of deep sea mining

Precious materials needed for tech lay on the seafloor; could robots go get them?
Subscribe to Freethink on Substack for free
Get our favorite new stories right to your inbox every week

Cobalt, copper, nickel, zinc — these are the precious materials needed for an increasingly tech-driven world, and deep sea mining may be the key to keeping pace.

The challenges, however, are obvious — a crushing blackness barely understood, home to ultra-black deep sea fish and ancient microbes. It is a world apart and better suited to autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) than human submariners.

These self-diving robots are already revolutionizing underwater exploration, and they could also be put to work deep sea mining, IEEE Spectrum‘s Maria Gallucci reports.

Brooklyn-based Pliant Energy Systems may have a robot potentially suitable for the job. The company is working to turn their Velox robot — which resembles a headless cuttlefish mantle, with undulating, flexible fins running down its flanks — into an autonomous deep sea mining machine.

Per Gallucci, Pliant is partnering with MIT to make a next-gen version. Dubbed C-Ray, it will be larger than Velox, and utilize metal detectors, camera suites, and algorithms to navigate and explore — beginning with sussing out hazards for the Navy, who’s footing the bill.

The long-term vision for deep sea mining is a swarm of C-Rays, communicating via hive mind, scouring the seafloor. They’ll seek out surface deposits of precious materials — called polymetallic nodules — and put them into cages that could then be floated up to the surface.

Already, the institutional framework for deep sea mining is beginning to come into focus. The International Seabed Authority solidified their Mining Code last fall, the first step in commercial deep sea mining. Thirty exploratory permits have been issued, Gallucci reports, the majority for the type of polymetallic nodule skimming that C-Ray is envisioned as doing.

While proponents envision deep sea mining as potentially less environmentally damaging than stripping back the earth’s surface — and less exploitive than, say, Congolese cobalt mines — the deep seas do provide unique environmental challenges.

“On the one hand, we need these metals to electrify and decarbonize,” Pliant Energy Systems founder and CEO Pietro Filardo told Gallucci. “On the other hand, people worry we’re going to destroy deep ocean ecosystems that we know very little about.”

It’s a sentiment shared by scientists; we know so little about the deep sea, how can we know what our impact may be?

“One thing I often talk about is, ‘How do we fix it if we break it? How are we going to know we broke it?'” Cindy Lee Van Dover, a Duke deep sea biologist, told Gallucci.

Subscribe to Freethink on Substack for free
Get our favorite new stories right to your inbox every week
Related
A personal assistant for everyone: The promise of ambient AI
We’re leaving the app era and entering the age of ambient AI: intelligent help that’s always on, but never in the way.
Gen Z: We must resist the temptation to cheat on everything
Adopting the “cheat on everything” mentality — treating thinking as a burden AI can eliminate — is not only wrong, it’s dangerous.
There are no new ideas in AI — only new datasets
Our next AI breakthrough will come when we unlock a source of data we’ve either overlooked or never fully harnessed.
Albert Einstein said automation caused the Great Depression. It didn’t.
Einstein blamed automation for the widespread unemployment of the Great Depression, but his reasoning was based on a false premise.
Has AI made “learn to code” obsolete?
Freethink talks to the creator of the world’s most popular AI coding assistant to find out whether learning to code is still worthwhile.
Up Next
Placenta Exam
Subscribe to Freethink for more great stories