MIT built an AI to design robots

Tell the AI what a bot needs to be able to do, and it handles the robot design process.
Subscribe to Freethink on Substack for free
Get our favorite new stories right to your inbox every week

The robot revolution is already happening, and nearly every vision of the near future includes more bots in our homes, workplaces, and other spaces.

Someone has to design all these robots — and a new MIT project suggests that AI might be up to the task.

Automating Robot Design

Today’s robots all tend to have the same design based on their task, researcher Allan Zhao told MIT News — if a bot needs to be able to walk over various terrains, for example, a designer is likely to give it four legs like a dog.

That prompted Zhao and his colleagues to wonder if a creative AI might come up with a more innovative robot design that humans just haven’t thought of yet (because we’re too set on following patterns we’ve seen in nature).

To find out, they developed an AI system they call RoboGrammar.

To create a new robot design, RoboGrammar was told what parts were available (joints, wheels, etc.) and what type of terrain it needs to navigate (flat surfaces, steps, etc.).

The AI then came up with hundreds of thousands of possible robot designs, all of which followed specific rules (called “grammar”) provided by the researchers — e.g., you must use joints to connect leg segments.

“It was pretty inspiring for us to see the variety of designs,” Zhao said. “It definitely shows the expressiveness of the grammar.”

The robots were placed in a simulated environment, where the goal was always the same: move forward as fast as possible.

After testing the bots navigating various terrains, it appears human robot designers — and biological evolution — have been on the right track.

“Most designs did end up being four-legged in the end,” Zhao said. “Maybe there really is something to it.”

However, the AI broke with that pattern when designing robots for flat, icy terrain. One of its creations had six legs and another had just two, which it used to pull along a dragging body, maximizing traction.

The bodies of the four-legged robots, meanwhile, tended to change depending on the terrain. A bot optimized to cross over gaps, for example, had a stiff body, while one designed to move over ridges had two joints between its front and back legs.

The Future of RoboGrammar

The MIT researchers don’t expect RoboGrammar to swipe robot design jobs from humans — rather, they see the system as being a tool that can help spark roboticists’ creativity, prompting them to consider design features that might not be immediately obvious.

Next, the researchers plan to actually build some of the designs RoboGrammar came up with to test their function in the real world, but they think the system might be useful for virtual robot design, too.

“Let’s say in a video game you wanted to generate lots of kinds of robots, without an artist having to create each one,” Zhao said. “RoboGrammar would work for that almost immediately.”

We’d love to hear from you! If you have a comment about this article or if you have a tip for a future Freethink story, please email us at [email protected].

Subscribe to Freethink on Substack for free
Get our favorite new stories right to your inbox every week
Related
The missing tech case for how we create an era of abundance
AI and other new technologies could make things that are costly and scarce today, cheap and abundant for all tomorrow.
Why America reinvents itself every 80 years — and is doing so again
Three separate theories help explain why America enters a period of great progress every 80 years — and why another is coming soon.
How DeepSeek rewrote the rules of the AI race
Chinese startup DeepSeek has proven that vast quantities of capital and cutting-edge chips aren’t prerequisites for world-class AI.
Kevin Kelly points a new way forward into the Age of AI
One of the most original and optimistic thinkers in America helps build out some big through lines on what’s possible with AI in the next 25 years.
The artifact isn’t the art: Rethinking creativity in the age of AI
ChatGPT’s Studio Ghibli imitations invite questions about the creative value of people and what we really mean when we talk about creativity.
Up Next
ai counts trees
Subscribe to Freethink for more great stories