Pager panic: When beepers were infiltrating schools

What can we learn from the relics of a past moral panic?
Sign up for Pessimists Archive Substack
Pessimists Archive is a project to jog our collective memories about the hysteria, technophobia, and moral panic that often greets new technologies, ideas, and trends.

In the twilight of the 1980s, pagers—a precursor to today’s ubiquitous smartphones—became a symbol of both status and scandal among teenagers.

Their increasing association with drug dealers, however, soon ensnared them in the era’s surging drug-related moral panic. This association became especially pronounced following a 1988 exposé by the Washington Post, which detailed the device’s prominence in narcotics sales, catalyzing a media frenzy with headlines like “Beepers Flourish in Drug Business” and “Drug Beepers: Paging Devices Popular with Cocaine Dealers.”

The narrative soon evolved from drug dealers use pagers to pagers symbolize drugs. Beepers were portrayed as not just a distracting teenage fad but as direct conduits to drugs. Educational leaders and lawmakers were quick to respond. James Fleming of Dade Public Schools told The New York Times: “How can we expect students to ‘just say no to drugs’ when we allow them to wear the most dominant symbol of the drug trade on their belts?”

This sentiment precipitated a slew of regulations, ranging from complete bans on students with pagers in New Jersey—which threatened severe penalties up to six months in jail for violations—to similar punitive measures across various states, including Michigan and Illinois.

Chicago’s approach was particularly stringent, with its Public Schools Security Chief, George Sims, linking pager possession among students not just to drugs but also to prostitution. The city’s crackdown led to significant numbers of school suspensions and actual arrests, reflecting a nationwide trend towards harsh punitive measures for what many saw as a direct link to drug culture. These actions, however, were not without controversy and often resulted in headline-making incidents, such as the arrest of children and even a 5-year-old’s suspension for bringing a beeper on a school trip.

Amidst this backlash, Motorola, which dominated the pager market, launched a counter-offensive in 1994. The campaign was designed to rebrand pagers as essential tools for youth communication, foreshadowing modern PR strategies by digital giants like TikTok to influence public perception and policy. Motorola’s efforts included youth-driven design think tanks and strategic partnerships, like their notable collaboration with PepsiCo to distribute low-cost pagers.

As the digital age advanced, the narrative around communication devices and youth shifted. The beeper laws, once seen as vital for protecting youth from the perils of drug trafficking, gradually became recognized as relics of a past moral panic—echoed today in the debates surrounding smartphone use in schools. Despite this evolution, echoes of the past resurface in contemporary discussions, reflecting a cyclical debate about youth, technology, and societal values.

Louis Anslow is the author Pessimists Archive newsletter, exploring society’s fears about old things when they were new. For more stories like this, you can subscribe to Pessimists Archive here.

Sign up for Pessimists Archive Substack
Pessimists Archive is a project to jog our collective memories about the hysteria, technophobia, and moral panic that often greets new technologies, ideas, and trends.
Related
A memo from the future
In the world of 2069, humans have more reach, more speed, and more leverage than any previous generation.
Progress is a grand project for humanity
Progress offers meaning, demands virtue, and calls builders to turn bold ideas into wonders that uplift human life.
Retro Biosciences wants to add 10 healthy years to your life
Backed by $180 million in funding from OpenAI’s Sam Altman, Joe Betts-LaCroix’s Retro Biosciences is racing to extend the human healthspan.
AI deadbots can keep “you” around after death — what does that mean for the living?
We can now use AI to create versions of real people that can live on long after their bodies die. But should we?
How technocracy made us doubt progress
The 20th century left us with fatalism, defeatism, and a hollowed-out vision of the future. Techno-humanism can restore our belief in progress.
Up Next
A sleek, modern car with glowing blue digital data and numbers overlayed on it, set against a dark background with a red gradient.
Subscribe to Freethink for more great stories