Mutations in 16 species reveal clues to human aging

Regardless of size or lifespan, we all acquire the same number of somatic mutations.

After sequencing the genomes of 16 species, researchers at the Wellcome Sanger Institute found a surprising pattern in how often mammal cells mutate — and it could be a boon to longevity research.

Somatic mutations: As humans and other mammals grow older, our cells undergo genetic changes called “somatic mutations.” While these mutations are the most common cause of cancer, most are harmless and none can be passed down to offspring.

Researchers have suspected a link between somatic mutations and aging since the 1950s, but studying them has traditionally been difficult. Thanks to advances in DNA sequencing tech, that’s no longer the case. 

Somatic mutations are genetic changes our cells undergo as we grow older.

What’s new? For their study, Sanger scientists sequenced the genomes of 48 individuals from 16 mammalian species: black-and-white colobus monkey, cat, cow, dog, ferret, giraffe, harbor porpoise, horse, human, lion, mouse, naked mole-rat, rabbit, rat, ring-tailed lemur, and tiger.

When they looked at the somatic mutations in the animals’ cells, they saw that the longer a species lived, the fewer mutations its cells acquired each year, but every species seemed to have a lifetime maximum of about 3,200 mutations.

“To find a similar pattern of genetic changes in animals as different from one another as a mouse and a tiger was surprising,” said first author Alex Cagan. “But the most exciting aspect of the study has to be finding that lifespan is inversely proportional to the somatic mutation rate.”

“This suggests that somatic mutations may play a role in aging, although alternative explanations may be possible,” he continued.

Peto’s paradox: The Sanger researchers had hoped their study would shed light on Peto’s paradox, an observation made by epidemiologist Richard Peto in 1977.

Peto noted that, in theory, larger or longer-living species should have a higher cancer risk than smaller or shorter-living ones — after all, they have more cells available to mutate and more time for them to develop those mutations — but in reality, that’s not the case.

Unfortunately, the mystery remains — the Sanger team found no significant association between a species’ rate of somatic mutations and their body mass after accounting for lifespan.

“To find a similar pattern of genetic changes in animals as different from one another as a mouse and a tiger was surprising.”

Alex Cagan

Looking ahead: Aging is a complex process that somatic mutations alone aren’t likely to explain. However, the link between these mutations and lifespan is intriguing for longevity research  — perhaps by slowing down our mutation rate, we might be able to slow aging, too.

Before any such studies could happen, though, more research is needed.

The Sanger team now plans to look at the rates of somatic mutations in non-mammalian species, including the Greenland shark, which can live for more than 400 years, to see if the lifetime mutation limit they’ve discovered extends beyond mammals. 

We’d love to hear from you! If you have a comment about this article or if you have a tip for a future Freethink story, please email us at [email protected].

Related
This “living medicine” can eliminate a deadly lung infection
Researchers have engineered bacteria to create a “living medicine” against a nasty respiratory bug.
5 biotech trends to watch in 2023
After a monumental year of breakthroughs, scientists, investors, and CEOs share which areas of biotech they are eagerly watching this year.
Study finds 155 tiny new genes evolving in humans
Microproteins encoded in short strands of DNA reveal our recent evolutionary history, and hint at how human genetics may be changing.
“Jumping genes”: A new model of Alzheimer’s
A new hypothesis suggests that Alzheimer’s disease is the result of “jumping genes” in the brain, not inflammation or plaque.
Resurrecting a 2.6 billion-year-old ancient CRISPR system
Researchers have resurrected an ancient CRISPR system 2.6 billion years old, capable of editing genes in the modern day.
Up Next
Subscribe to Freethink for more great stories