Microdosing’s benefits may be powered by belief 

A small placebo-controlled study found that expectation could account for microdosing’s effects.

Despite its popularity, the practice of microdosing — taking small, non-psychoactive doses of a psychedelic for mental health benefits — is currently bereft of strong scientific evidence. 

Microdosing lacks the kind of clinical evidence that ketamine, psilocybin, and MDMA have accumulated for treating depression and PTSD. (Several are so promising that they seem on the precipice of being FDA approved in the US.) 

It also, as a feature, avoids psychedelic trips, something that may be key to psychedelics’ potential beneficial effects.

Still, the practice has gained a following, as people report improvements in well-being, including enhanced creativity, improved energy, and just overall feeling better.

A new paper in Translational Psychiatry suggests that those benefits may be driven, at least in part, by the positive expectations of microdosing.

Microdosing has gained a following as people report improvements in their day-to-day mental and emotional health.

Great expectations: Although not as robust as other areas of psychedelic research, there is some evidence — gathered from observational and open-label studies, or online surveys — that microdosing is correlated with improved cognition, creativity, and mood, as well as reduced anxiety and depression.

But there is a big problem with these studies.

“Unfortunately, these studies lack adequate controls and are based on self-selected samples, rendering them vulnerable to confirmatory bias,” the researchers wrote — read: people are coming into this believing in it.

“This is especially problematic in the case of microdosing, since users make up a self-selected sample with optimistic expectations about the outcome of the practice,” they wrote. 

Positivity bias, low doses, and self-assessment opens the door to a strong placebo effect.

“When restricted to studies that follow double-blind and placebo-controlled experimental designs, considerably less evidence supports the positive effects of microdosing.”

Setting expectations: The researchers enrolled 34 people — 23 men, 11 women — who had intended to start psilocybin microdosing. 

Over the course of two weeks, volunteers were given two half-gram doses of psilocybin one week and two half-gram doses of a placebo the other. The study was double-blind and randomized by a third party, meaning both the researchers and the volunteers were in the dark over who was getting what, when.

Subjects were asked to do a psychological self-assessment two days before dosing, tasks on Wednesdays and Fridays, and a battery of tests on Friday, including activities meant to measure creativity, cognition, and perception. 

Over two weeks, volunteers were given two half-gram doses of psilocybin one week and two half-gram doses of a placebo the other. Both the researchers and the volunteers were in the dark over who was getting what, when.

The electrical activity of their brains was also measured using electroencephalography (EEG), and participants were asked to explain how they felt microdosing may change their mental state.

The self-reported questionnaires showed a higher level of acute effects in the microdosing group, PsyPost explained, but only in subjects who had correctly figured out when they were taking psilocybin. 

EEG readings were different on psilocybin as compared to a placebo, which may be a precursor to similar effects shown at higher doses of psychedelics.

But the team found no evidence of “positive impact of psilocybin on subjects’ creativity, cognition, or self-reported mental well-being,” PsyPost reported. 

According to the team, their evidence suggests that the noticed effects of the psilocybin were stemming, at least partly, from the subject’s expectations of microdosing.

The study suggests that the noticed effects of the psilocybin were stemming, at least partly, from the subject’s expectations.

Limits and next steps: While adding a double-blind placebo control, the study still had important limitations — besides its small sample size — PsyPost reported. Among them is the short duration of observation; a longer look at microdosing may reveal cumulative effects, although the potential health impacts of microdosing must be studied first, the team says.

Participants were also not suffering from diagnosable mental health conditions, the presence of which may be tied to psilocybin’s benefits.

“Clearly,” the authors wrote, “more research is needed to decide whether microdosing with psychedelics can deliver at least some of its promised positive effects.”

We’d love to hear from you! If you have a comment about this article or if you have a tip for a future Freethink story, please email us at [email protected]

Related
Creatine, a popular exercise supplement, might help treat depression
Creatine shows promise as a treatment for depression, boosting the effects of SSRIs and potentially working as a standalone medication.
Are near-death experiences just psychedelic trips? 
One possible explanation of near death experiences is that our brains are flooded with a hallucinogenic, DMT.
Meth addiction treatments are finally on the horizon
New antibody and drug therapies may soon help treat meth patients, who currently have no pharmacological interventions.
San Francisco decriminalizes plant-based psychedelics 
San Francisco joins Oakland, Santa Cruz, DC, and Denver in decriminalizing some psychedelics.
Procrastinating is linked to health and career problems – but here’s how you can stop
In the long run, procrastination isn’t an effective way of managing emotions and causes health and work setbacks.
Up Next
Subscribe to Freethink for more great stories